On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>wrote:
> On terça-feira, 10 de setembro de 2013 22:31:53, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > On 10 September 2013 14:27, Knoll Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok, let's use QtWin for the namespace. For the module itself it makes > IMO > > > to keep the 'Extras' in the name. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Lars > > > > QtWin or QWin? > > QtWin, it's a namespace. > I believe he is aware of that... I think, Sze please correct me if I am wrong, he just wanted to make sure because there was several emails last year about QFoo or QtFoo for the namespace, and it seemed that the suboptimal naming was chosen for other reasons.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
