On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 21:06:03, John Layt wrote: > * Choose either local msecs or epoch msecs, if epoch then that change can't > be done for 5.2
Choose the easiest for you to implement. We're running out of time, so I'd rather stick to the implementation you have and your best recommendation. > * Accept second occurrence won't be solved for 5.2, document behaviour as > undefined Yep, like I told you on G+. Document that it is undefined which occurrence of the overlapping hour is selected, period. I don't see the need to change this, ever. > * Integrate QTimeZone -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
