On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 00:02:45, Stromme Christian wrote:
> So the options are QAndroidJniXxx and QJniXxx? Personally I prefer the
> later.

Would this class work with a different JNI? Suppose Qt Jambi wanted to use 
those classes. Would they even compile?

If so, then the generic name might make sense.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to