On 5 Nov 2013, at 8:04 pm, Peter Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I also think having 2 maintainers versus 1 maintainer for QtNetwork will 
> not matter much in practice; but if people demand to have one single 
> go-to person I am also fine with either of us taking that role.
> 

I don't have a problem with two maintainers in this area, either. 

> Peter
> 
> 
> On 11/04/2013 09:38 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I think there's a valid question in who gets to be the arbiter should
>> Peter and I disagree on something, however between Peter, Shane and I
>> we've been working with pretty much this model anyway - I can't
>> imagine that any of us would allow something through that one of the
>> others disagreed with. In a situation like this, then we always have
>> Lars as a tie breaker with his chief maintainer hat on

+1 Even _with_ only one maintainer in an area, the chief maintainer is the 
arbiter.


>> I'd guess that any likely tie in this situation would be more along
>> the lines of /should/ we support a feature rather than how the feature
>> is supported. I don't see this being a problem based on the way we've
>> managed to run stuff for the last couple of years, but if we really
>> need a designated QtNetwork tie breaker, then really either of us
>> could be that person. It seems a but academic to me since Peter, Shane
>> and I have been collaborating on the network stack since opengov
>> started, so this isn't a new team or any kind of dramatic change.
>> 
>> I don't mind how people want this to be handled. Joint maintainership
>> or a designated tie breaker is fine with me.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Rich.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this 
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Lorn Potter
QtSensors/QtSensorGestures/QtSystemInfo
llornkcor technologies / Jolla Mobile




_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to