On 02 Nov 2013, at 17:58, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2013 07:29:56, Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> We should have the applications made with Qt 4.8.5 on Mac OS 10.7 (for >> example) working in 10.9 without serious issues. And we should be able to >> agree together what is a serious enough issue to take the risk with 5.2 >> getting delayed due to making of 4.8.6. One option is to make a patch >> available and ask users to build themselves. > > I'm getting complaints from our Subsurface devs on Mac that 4.8.5 is utterly > broken there. > > Does anyone know what patches have already been applied to 4.8.6 that are > needed for Mavericks support? What the outstanding issues are, if any? We have a couple of patches in flight: Applied: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,69325 (corewlan compile fix) Pending: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,69327 (colorspace related performance regression, Shawn is handling this one) https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,69328 (Webkit compile fix - help needed by webkit expert) https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70097 (Correct system font) QTBUG-34107 (qfiledialog sandboxing issue) (Qt 5 patch: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70382) Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
