On terça-feira, 5 de novembro de 2013 12:05:13, Marc Mutz wrote: > This just adds missing implementation, it's rediculous not to backport to > 5.1, is it?
Backporting to 5.1 would be safe, indeed. But it's not urgent. Anyone trying to use those methods has failed to compile, so it's not a regression. I wouldn't call it P0 or P1. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
