On quarta-feira, 6 de novembro de 2013 21:51:39, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 06.11.2013, 21:01, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" <[email protected]>: > > Hi! Some days ago Sune Vuorela pointed me at: > > > > <https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,67001> > > > > Now this means that, if not explicitily overriden, an ABI incompatible > > change will happen on arm*. > > > > In Debian we are considering if the problem of breaking ABI without a > > soname bump is worth the effort for armhf, but it would be also good to > > try and coordinate between distros so as to try to keep binary > > compatibility between us. > > > > What are you thinking about this? > > Use of double in "no fpu" clause looks really wrong.
That's "armhf", where the "hf" stands for "hard float". I should also point out that this option now allows selecting qreal to be float on other platforms, besides ARM. Many MIPS boards are FPU-less, so they might benefit from a change. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
