On Monday 18 November 2013 12:46:24 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Monday 18 November 2013 11:06:57 Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance > > improvements in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4. > > > > Most notably there is https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,34112 > > which > > effects us in Kate/KDE as outlined here: > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225228 > > > > The changeset above was merged in Qt5 and matured there, see > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,34118 > > > > What I propose is to sync the current status of QTextLayout/QTextEngine > > from Qt5, put it into a patchset for Qt4 and get it into the next Qt4 > > release. > > > > Would this be accepted? Or is there still a policy which forbids > > performance improvements to be merged into Qt4? Considering that the > > above makes the Kate editor practically useless for some files (freezes > > for multiple minutes), I personally see this as a bug fix anyways... > > Don't forget that if you want to backport this patch, you also need at least > to backport > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/31089 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/31090 > and > https://codereview.qt-project.org/34288
Yep, I'd ensure that everything is backported until the current state in Qt5 is reached. Bye -- Milian Wolff [email protected] http://milianw.de _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
