On 27 Nov 2013, at 16:24, Ziller Eike <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Adding plugins into the respective frameworks would simplify deployment >>> significantly. macdeployqt's task would be reduced to inspecting the >>> frameworks the app links against, and copying the framework folders into >>> the bundle. Don't need to think about plugins, don't need to mess with >>> install names. It just works.™ >> >> Yeah. > > I’m all for self-contained, relocatable Qt (@rpath, plugins in bundles, etc), > and afair the corresponding Qt Project maintainers too. It’s a bit > independent from the question of how to distribute Qt packages for developers > though. >
macdeployqt has been chasing after which plugins to deploy ever since it started to support deploying plugins. What we need is a per-platform default plugin list for each module. This list should be maintained by the module maintainer. MODULE_PLUGIN_TYPES is a start, perhaps we can use something similar for specific plugins. Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
