For a QML type in a .qml file, qdoc reports an error if it sees a QML property 
it thinks should be in the public API for that QML type and there is no 
\qmlproperty comment immediately preceding that property in the .qml file.

But for a QML type that is represented by a C++ class, qdoc doesn't know which 
C++ properties are meant to be be documented as QML properties, so it can't 
report an error if a C++ property is not documented as a QML property.

Maybe we should change this policy and tell qdoc to require a \qmlproperty for 
every C++ property that has a \property ?

martin
________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Alan 
Alpert [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 7:32 AM
To: Mark Gaiser
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Development] Can the "hidden" QML properties please be    
documented?

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Mark Gaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Nurmi J-P <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01 Dec 2013, at 00:42, Mark Gaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Recently i was searching for a way to influence the "dragDistance" in
>>> QML. The documentation (i even looked at dev snapshot docs) didn't
>>> provide any clue, but the code did. Turns out there is a hidden
>>> property:
>>>
>>> drag.threshold (it is underlined in red in QtCreator, but works just fine!).
>>
>> Perhaps you're reading Qt 5.1.x docs? MouseArea::drag::threshold is a new 
>> property that was added in September. The documentation is there in the 
>> latest snapshot: 
>> http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/qt5-release/qml-qtquick-mousearea.html
>>
>>>
>>> For font rendering there is the hidden property:
>>>
>>> renderType
>>>
>>> Which works just fine, but is nowhere to be found in the Qt documentation.
>>>
>>
>> QQuickText::renderType was indeed missing from the docs. It has been fixed 
>> in Qt 5.2.0:
>> - https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35018
>> - https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,72391
>>
>> --
>> J-P Nurmi
>
> That's awesome!
> It still makes me wonder, how many more are "hidden"? I hope none :)

I hope so too, as it's usually a doc bug. Feel free to file further
issues like this on bugreports.qt-project.org .

--
Alan Alpert
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to