On terça-feira, 3 de dezembro de 2013 07:42:27, Knoll Lars wrote: > I think people simply forgot about it. The message went out just before > christmas last year, when everybody was just happy to have gotten 5.0 out. > So let’s give people another few weeks to fix atomics for 5.3.
They can have a few months, in fact. That is, they have until 5.3-rc1 branching, but I'd much rather the implementations landed before the 5.3 feature freeze. What I need now is the announcement, so no one is caught unprepared six months from now. > The change log entry for 5.2 is IMO the wrong message if we want to keep > some of the platforms alive after all. In addition, none of the platforms > you mark as being deprecated where supported with Qt 5 in the first place. > So I’d be happier if we reworded this, saying that the old basicatomics > are deprecated and support for them will get removed in 5.3. Done. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
