On Wednesday 18 December 2013 09:04:20 Thiago Macieira wrote: [snip] > If only we could get the opinion of a Linux distribution known for being a > stickler to the free software definitions, to the point of even having their > own free software guidelines... ;-)
;-) > I guess that you brought this up because Debian would have a problem with > it. We do, and also Fedora[0] and Red Hat[1] [0] <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses> [1] <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507> > I'm going to say that we have a problem with it too, both as open > source and free software devs and from the commercial point of view. From > FOSS point of view, we don't limit what you can do with the software; from > the commercial point of view, some segments of the industry (like defence) > might not like it. Needless to say that I agree with this. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
