I see, thanks.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Sze Howe Koh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 January 2014 09:00, Jiergir Ogoerg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks a lot, I was about to write I figured it out, but your reply >> gave me further insight. > > You're welcome. > > >> The prick required _all_ previous commits to have Change-Id too.. took >> me a while to figure this out.. and to learn git rebase.. > > Necessity is the mother of speedy learning ;) > > >> What I can't figure out is - which qt version (4 or 5) do these belong to? >> >> For example I pushed (then abandoned) this: >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,74520 >> >> Was it in queue for Qt4 or Qt5, the webpage doesn't mention any of these.. > > That's Qt 5. Qt 5 has the modular structure with different submodules > (the "Project" field values are "qt/qtbase", "qt/qtdeclarative", > etc.), and uses the new "dev"/"stable"/"release" branch model: > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines. You may come across some > unreleased Qt 5 submodules that use the old branch model, with a > "master" branch. > > Qt 4 is monolithic (the "Project" field is only "qt/qt"), and the only > active branch is "4.8". Example: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,73452 > > > Qt 5 example: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,status:open+project:qt/qtbase,n,z > Qt 4 example: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,status:open+project:qt/qt,n,z > > > Sze-Howe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
