Hi Tomasz,

Yes you are correct.  As of last week we now depend on qtbase/stable in 
qtwayland/stable so the version number does need to be changed now.  We are a 
bit out of sync now with regard to following dev and stable with the rest of Qt 
(despite using those names) but that can be resolved fairly easily now.  Feel 
free to submit a patch correcting this, otherwise I'll fix it when I'm back in 
the office next week.

Regards,
Andy Nichols

________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Tomasz 
Olszak [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 6:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Development] Qt Wayland versioning

Currently qtwayland/stable depends on qtbase/stable and still has 5.1.0 in 
.qmake.conf. When I built it I ended up with 
QtWaylandClient/5.1.0/QtWaylandClient/private/* private headers created.

Am I right thinking that despite Qt Wayland is marked as addon module it should 
follow the regular/essential modules versioning?

--
regards,
Tomasz Olszak
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to