On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Qi Liang <[email protected]> wrote: > What is qt modularization for? We want to have different release cycles for > different qt modules.
As I recall, that means we want to be able to have different release/versioning cycles, but there will still be a regular Qt release package containing some version of all essential modules (and compatible with some version of all addon modules) even if some haven't bumped their version. > Then +1 for that. > > For offline installer, I suggest, a separate installer for it, but it should > based on installed qt directory. It is compatible with 5.2.0 release in this > way. > For online installer, every module is an option, then not much difference > there. Isn't this the distinction between addon modules and essential modules? Is Frederik asking for enginio to become a "Qt Essential" module? Or am I a little behind in my terminology? -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
