On 2014-02-05 12:19, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em qua 05 fev 2014, às 10:37:27, Robert Knight escreveu: >>> The idea was to silently return a default-constructed type. >> >> I'm not keen on that. Aside from adding extra restrictions to the >> types that the class can be used with as you mention, >> it runs the much more severe risk of masking serious bugs. > > No way around it if we exclude exceptions. > > We need to return something.
...or you could abort, which I assume is what operator* does? -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
