On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Sze Howe Koh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The repository is currently comprised of two main libraries: >>> QmfMessageServer and QmfClient. I would propose: >>> >>> QmfClient => QtMail >>> QmfMessageServer => QtMessageServer >>> >>> Classes in QMF are already using the QMail* prefix. >>> >>> Any objections? >> >> +1 > > +1 for renaming, to avoid confusion (people might mistake them for > "QML Client" or "QML Message Server") > > To make the relationship between the 2 libraries more obvious, I'd > give them similar names (e.g. "QtEmailClient" and "QtEmailServer").
I was kind of deliberately avoiding the "Email" name due to awkward capitalisation, I also think that "Mail" is sufficiently clear in an IT context. I wouldn't expect to find a Qt API for postal mail, after all. :-) You're right that it should probably be QtMailMessageServer, though. > How big are the libraries? If they're small, what do you think of > merging them into one library? I think there is value in keeping them split. The message server library is something that I personally think of as more of an implementation detail. It's used to implement plugins for the messageserver binary, not mail client tools. That's rather a limited goal/audience compared to the main library. BR, Robin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
