Em sáb 08 mar 2014, às 18:18:17, Andreas Aardal Hanssen escreveu: > On 08 Mar 2014, at 18:11, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > Interest, yes. But it's a low-priority because QFtp can't resume. You > > can't > > send a command that might fail because QFtp will abort the connection. > > In order to support resuming file transfers, supporting IPv6, not to > > mention directory listing, we'd need to rewrite the backend from scratch. > > That's the low priority. Don't expect it to happen, at all. > > When you say “we”, do you mean the Digia or the Intel Qt developers, or the > community?
I can tell you that the Intel Qt developers don't have the priority. But in this case, I meant "the community currently working on QtNetwork", given past discussions with Peter, Shane and Richard. > If someone, including the requesting party themselves, does such work, I’m > sure there are reviewers / approvers ready to do the reviewing. Oh, sure. If someone supplied the rewrite, I'm sure we'd be happy to take it in. We might even help out a little. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
