On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:12:18 Koehne Kai wrote: > I had a discussion with this with a couple of people, including Lars. In the > end we realized that both models are too complicated, and we should rather > have only one branch. Reality shows that we're working pretty sequential, > anyway: Everyone should concentrate right now on Qt 5.3.0, and afterwards > on Qt 5.3.1. When Qt 5.3.1 is out we can then decide whether we want to go > for Qt 5.3.2, or for Qt 5.4.0 ... It's up to you of course to prepare > patches for the next version locally (it's git!), but they should be only > submitted when the next version is being created.
Can we re-introduce ifdefs in 'the branch' for Qt 4.8.x/5.y.z so that we can compile either from the same codebase? Thanks, -- Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
