On 2 Apr 2014, at 6:07 PM, Ariel Molina wrote:

> The current state of Qt docs is very sad, making online searches near to 
> useless. All Google searches refer either to broken pages, to 4.x doc pages, 
> to incomplete 5.0 unstables or even to 3.3 documentation. What's the point on 
> having 5.x (or any) docs if you keep moving them around hiding it from search 
> engines and breaking links on every site that links to you?
> 
> You might point a root folder, but, let's be honest, none uses any root 
> folder to search, everyone uses Google or another search engine.
> 
> Please whatever you do, do not break this anymore, the current state is 
> already messed up. 

I agree.  But I think the idea was to change it one last time and then never 
change it again, and the docs that google finds should be always the latest 
rather than a particular version.  I hope that goal is achieved...

> 
> Ariel
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:55:46PM +0000, Pasion Jerome wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > We plan to deploy the redirects next week to avoid the Easter break; 
> > hopefully, Monday.
> >
> > Some more notes:
> > A) The Qt 5.0, 5.1, and 5.2 documentation sets are already hosted in the 
> > archives: http://doc.qt.digia.com/archives/index.html
> > There will be links to them from qt-project.org/doc/.
> >
> what sense does that make? qt-project.org should not have external
> dependencies.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ariel Molina R.
> 
> Oficina: +52 (222) 3723196
> Movil: +521 2226 758874
> http://edis.mx
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to