On 26.04.2014 17:39, André Pönitz wrote: > > You could have made the point "declarative structures are good for GUI > description" for Qt Widget's .ui files, after all, .ui files contents > pretty much _is_ declaring layout nesting and property values.
Just an idea: Declarative-only QML files could be translated to C++ by a tool similar to uic, and then used by a C++-only successor of QtWidgets. Or are there any technical reasons why all the state-of-the-features provided by QML v2 could not be implemented on the C++ side assuming there is a QML-to-C++ code generation step? Having a clear cut between declarative and imperative QML would also improve visibility of specification- and implementation-parts of a QML file. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
