On 13/05/2014 16:47, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em ter 13 maio 2014, às 09:57:59, Knoll Lars escreveu: >>> That won't help unless we also disable the revdep for QtQuick, as QtQuick >>> depends on QtNetwork. >> That doesn’t mean we need to run the network tests as a revdep as well. > Then the problem is simply of running the network tests. The CI could be smart > and decide that it doesn't need to run tests/auto/network if src/network > wasn't modified. >
I don't think that this is a good idea. Changes in QtCore which break something in network wouldn't cause a CI error and test failures would only surface as soon as a change to network is made. Isn't that one of the situations we want to avoid? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
