Hi all, Qt5.3.0 is now out and I think it is time to proceed with this, right?
I don't fully understood what we have agreed but according to my understanding we need to - Rename current release -branch to Qt 5.3.0 & close it - rename current stable to Qt 5.3 - Update http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines to match new branching scheme * New process & way of working needs to be defined here really clearly. A least for me it isn't clear at al... Lars, is it you who should take initial steps with these? Br, Jani >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] >>[mailto:[email protected]] >>On Behalf Of Knoll Lars >>Sent: 3. huhtikuuta 2014 11:03 >>To: Sergio Ahumada; [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>On 03/04/14 09:53, "Sergio Ahumada" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>>On 03.04.2014 09:42, Heikkinen Jani wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We are about to start the "Qt 5.3.0" release as agreed in [1], which >>>> means that: >>>> >>>> - We plan to do a fast-forward merge from 'stable' into 'release' branch >>>> on April 10th. >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I think I got lost somewhere. I thought we were going to create a 5.3.0 >>>branch instead of merging stable->release [1]. >> >>The decision has been to implement the new scheme after we have 5.3.0 >>out. >>So 5.3.0 is still being done with the existing scheme, and we should then >>create the new branch names after we have released 5.3.0. >> >>So directly after the release, I’d say we switch over and rename stable to >>5.3, and create the correct branches for older versions as well. >> >>> >>>Also, could somebody clarify how the new branching scheme would look >>like >>>? >>> >>>Maybe drafting something on top of >>>http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines ? >> >>Yes, that needs updating. >>> >>>It seems to me that there is a decision about going to the 5.x.y >>>branching scheme, but it is not clear how/when this will be implemented. >> >>Let’s do this directly after we have 5.3.0 out. It’s going to require a >>bit of work, as we will have to retarget some patches from stable to 5.3. >>We can get around most of that by creating 5.3 from stable, and then >>merge >>stable into 5.3 again after a week or two before we close it. >> >>The older 5.x branches should be created from the known tags on stable as >>well at that point in time to make things consistent. 5.3.1 would then get >>released using the new branching scheme. >> >>Cheers, >>Lars >> >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>[1]: >>>http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014- >>March/015969.html >>>-- >>>Sergio Ahumada >>>[email protected] >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Development mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Development mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
