On 17/06/14 18:31, "Robert Löhning" <robert.loehn...@digia.com> wrote:
>Am 17.06.2014 18:04, schrieb Thiago Macieira: >> Em ter 17 jun 2014, às 13:51:37, Robert Löhning escreveu: >>> we mostly already agreed on this at QtCS so I'd just like to stress one >>> point: "old" should not mean the time passed since creating the bug >>> report. There are bugs which have been listed for a long time but are >>> still actively discussed. "Old" in this context should mean the time >>> since the last comment, status change asf. So the nice comment would >>> come after 1 year of silence and the report would be closed after >>>nobody >>> replied to that comment for three months. >>> >>> I assume you meant that anyway? >> >> Yes. Old as in "inactive for a long time" >> > >By the way: What will happen to bug reports from now closed identities? >The reporter won't get any notification and I'm afraid the watchers >won't feel addressed by the "Need more info" comment. Simple. If nobody feels inclined to do anything, the bug will eventually get closed. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
