On Friday, June 27, 2014 12:37:21 Jocelyn Turcotte wrote: > We use private API, so: > - We need to only distribute QtWebEngine together with Qt, you can't > download QtWebEngine 1.0 that would work with both QtCore 5.4 and 5.5 > - We have to bump our minor/patch version for each new minor/patch release > of Qt, even if nothing changed in QtWebEngine, since we will eventually > have #ifdefs to switch from one Qt private API to the other and our list > of imported dynamic symbols will change. That means that the same code > wouldn't produce the same binary if build with two versions of Qt even if > they use the same configuration.
These seem to be arguments in favor of not using a disparate version scheme. Can you say why you need a disparate version scheme? Thanks, -- Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
