On Thursday 03 July 2014 15:13:17 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote: > > I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install > > and public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do > > you think? > > We have too many private headers already. We should work on getting rid > of them, not to create new ways to increase our collective headaches. > > So, a proper documented and stable api and abi would be much preferred.
FTR: Since Jocelyn on behalf of the QtWebEngine community urged me to not use private headers for this purpose as well, I have now made the QML API of QWebChannel public. It's pretty minimal anyways and I'm confident it can stay that way. Bye -- Milian Wolff | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
