On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Adam Strzelecki <[email protected]> wrote: >> On to my now standard question: Can you summarize the discussion so far into >> a proposal on what you want to change? Keep it as short as possible :) For >> example, I think it’s understood that (incremental) framework coping is fast >> - no need to go into details. On the other hand I think it’s important to >> make clear which parts of the current workflow we will leave behind. > > Well, in fact. It is me who has proposed changes and pushing them to Gerrit. > Jake is my advocate here ;) > > Please see post that summarized what we want (as you have previously > requested, but probably was lost in numerous other posts): > > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/017867.html > > FYI there are 3 new changes for 5.4 (instead for dev, requested by Oswald > Buddenhagen): > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/92071 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/92072 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/92073 >
I don’t see a change to macdeployqt here, but I suppose there should be one? Br, Eike -- Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
