On Monday 18 August 2014, you wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is it a problem that they have fake dependencies listed in gerrit? I > > often upload lists of patches like that, and land them out of order as > > they get reviewed. It appears to pose no particular problem, except that > > it can look a bit odd. > > Me too, if I'm lazy. It can confuse some reviewers (small problem), > but the annoyance I've faced is that rebasing will bump all changes > after the commit you actually change. Having multiple source branches > avoids that.
Well, I solve that by rebasing the patch on a clean branch if I need to rebase. The patches that used be after it will then have a dependency with the tag (OUTDATED), but they still work and stage fine. `Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
