On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:35:28 Simon Hausmann wrote: > On Tuesday 26. August 2014 09.30.05 Friedemann Kleint wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > That said, he surely has less time for Qt. Is the cmake integration > > > > creating any problems? > > > > Every now and then, we hit on a failure (fex with dynamic GL). So far, > > these have been simple compile/link errors in the tests, but the issue > > is that we might hit a wall once we really need to adapt some > > Cmakelist.txt, etc. > > I wouldn't call that an issue yet. We haven't hit that wall yet and after > spending a couple of hours with the cmake integration last week I'd feel > comfortable trying to help out with fixes if any issues occur. > > As much as I personally dislike certain aspects of cmake I can't ignore the > fact that the integration has users and helps to grow the number of people > using Qt, especially since this one comes out of the box.
The cmake test in qtbase probably catches most of the issues. The odd-man-out library is ActiveQt, which isn't one DLL but three static libraries. I think we should probably add some cmake tests to qtactiveqt.git module to make sure we don't break it again. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
