On 27 August 2014 14:55, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:21:38AM +0000, Knoll Lars wrote:of course lgpl2 > still makes sense for add-ons hosted outside qt-project, > and ones where the author explicitly doesn't want digia to make money > from selling this module (though in this case i wouldn't host on > qt-project to start with). > > I think it's a bad idea to start mixing qt-project decisions with digia decisions. If a 3rd party wants to release an addon as part of Qt and it's LGPLv2 then I think that's just fine. Digia making money on things should be independent of qt-project decisions. I also think digia should be able to release stuff under whatever license they want to - and those parts that are opensource should also live in qt-project. Cheers Rich.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
