On Friday 29 August 2014 13:43:20 André Somers wrote: > Knoll Lars schreef op 29-8-2014 13:17: > > But let's also add things in order. Local vs remote seems to be the > > use case that most people need so let's solve that first. Other > > attributes can be added later. Cheers, Lars > > I did not mean to suggest that this all be added right now. I was just > wondering about why Thiago did not want to see this expanding into more > type-related flags in the future. Future, not now :-)
I'm not against adding more information. I'm against making the local/remote/unknown requirement more blurry. I want it plainly obvious to anyone who uses the API that they have to deal with the "unknown" case and that it can mean every single device -- we may not be able to find a single local mountpoint. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
