On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:24:58 Валерий Котов wrote: > I realize that we had this discussion before. But I have to ask. =) > Does not it make sense to add method and type in Operations enum for > options in case we need some special treatment for "OPTIONS" verb?
Only if we have a method for it and we're not adding one. If it's just sendCustomVerb, then we don't need an enum entry. By the way, do you know of who would need OPTIONS *? What's the use-case, who would use it and how do they do it today? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
