I tend to agree. Sounds like a bug to me. Cheers, Lars
On 19/09/14 14:37, "BogDan" <bog_dan...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Hello folks, > > Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted >*before* >the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the >active >objects may still need to access the singletons in their destructor ... > >IMHO singletons should be the very last objects deleted (also in the >reverse >order). > >Is there any reason why they are deleted before the other active objects? >Or this is just a bug? > >Cheers, >BogDan. > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >Development@qt-project.org >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development