But say, if I want to submit this as part of QtCore, doesn't that package use one consistent license which I'll have to use? On Sep 24, 2014 3:05 PM, "Tomasz Siekierda" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 September 2014 11:34, Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2014-09-24, Yam Marcovic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> However, I will say I don't want to force people to give their sources > away > >> if they use it. > >> > >> So a license along the lines of 'this license is here for formal > purposes; > >> but feel free to do anything you want with this,' is good enough as far > as > >> I'm concerned. > > > > I think the formal way of expressing this is either the MIT, 2 or > > 3-clause BSD licenses. > > > > http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause > > http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause > > http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html > > > > /Sune > > This is probably the simplest you can go: WTFPL > http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
