On Sep 26, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Helmut Mülner <[email protected]> wrote:
> […] > ... because copy() failed (because malloc failed) and d was 0 and led to a > null pointer access. > This is a bug in QImage that should be fixed. Is Qt ever expected to “act sanely” in face of memory allocation failures? Is there a policy of gradual degradation, or is a null pointer dereference an acceptable outcome? Cheers, Kuba Ober _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
