On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:16:55PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > The proposal by Kuba would be to have everything use a QFileName or > similar class. So why not just use QUrl? > yes, i think kuba's proposal is just as unpractical as the qurl one.
i'd have a much more favorable view towards a QFileName class if it actually had some functionality of QFileInfo moved into it. but such a refactoring of the entire i/o class structure (hey, another thing we mentioned at the summit!) is a significantly bigger task than anyone was willing to take upon so far. therefore i think the only solution that is in scope (for qt 5 at least) is re-introducing escaping at the places where recoding must be done. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
