On 14/10/2014 5:40 pm, Kurt Pattyn wrote: > Hi, > > After a long time, I finally found time again to help Qt forward (at least > that is what I hope :-) ). > I have a few questions regarding the 'new' branching scheme: > 1. Is this somewhere documented? > 2. Where do bug fixes go? I talked to Peppe regarding this, and according to > him, bugs should be committed to branch of the version the bug first > manifested itself. Is this correct, as to my knowledge the 5.3 branch is > read-only? > 3. Where do new features go?
I too would like to know where the bugs are lodged because some bright spark decided that hard coding operating system version numbers in the clang make specs for Qt was a good idea. For that he gets a slow clap and the bug assigned to him when there's a clear procedure of where to lodge it. On the plus side, it can be overwritten on an individual basis. Unlike a certain language binding package written in the UK, whose author is next on my list for not only hardcoding the OS version number, but doing so in such a way that any attempt to fix it will be overwritten, thus breaking the fix. That's particularly special, but not for this list, for a different list. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
