On Tuesday 14 October 2014 08:59:27 Kurt Pattyn wrote: > 1. Is it worth the (big) effort to try to remove these warnings from the > public part of Qt?
Again, it depends on how intrusive those patches are. We already build Qt with a compiler warning check for all public headers and we could add a few more options to the compiler flags to enable more warnings. Not all of those that you wanted. That just made the code ugly. > 2. Are there other people, esp. working in strongly > regulated environments that have the same problem? I see that Qt is used a > lot in the automotive industry: how do these applications comply with > MISRA? They don't. MISRA doesn't apply to the IVI system. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
