Good idea. :)

I like the idea of using 3 as the base, as that's a good fallback when 
it's not really obvious.

You might want to explain that a lower number equals a higher priority, 
though. At least in my mind (even knowing that lower is higher in this 
case), adding 1 to a priority is synonymous with increasing the priority.

On 15/10/14 09:43, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While doing some bug triaging yesterday I noticed that we don't have a common 
> process to assess the priority of a bug. That is, JIRA lists some criteria, 
> and I think there's a common understanding what P0, P1 means ... but when it 
> comes to the difference between P2, P3, P4, and P5 it gets IMO really blurry.
>
> So here is my little attempt to formalize the assessment bit, and come up 
> with a somewhat reproducible bug priority based on severity, visibility, 
> whether it's a regression, and whether there's a workaround:
>
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/JIRA-Priorities
>
> Do you think that's helpful, and does this match the results your intuition? 
> If we can reach some consensus it might be worthwhile to integrate into 
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Triaging_Bugs .
>   
> Regards
>
> Kai
>
> PS: Obviously, the result of any such scheme should be considered not more 
> than a hint. There are lots of additional factors that might play a role. It 
> also applies mostly to bugs in the Qt source code itself, e.g. documentation 
> bugs, packaging bugs, ... might have different factors to check for.
>
> --------
> Kai Köhne, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
>
> Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
> Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja Sitz der 
> Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 
> B
>
> Email: kai.koe...@theqtcompany.com | Mobile: + 49 151 55155601 | Phone: +49 
> 30 63 92 3255 www.qt.io |Qt Blog: http://blog.qt.digia.com/ | Twitter: 
> @QtbyDigia, @Qtproject | Facebook: www.facebook.com/qt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to