On Tuesday 14 October 2014 20:41:22 Knoll Lars wrote: > >In my opinion those changes - as big as they may seem - could go in after > >the > >beat. Yes, they change the implementation a lot, but they barely affect > >the > >API. The beta is about being able to try out new features in Qt and > >getting > >feedback about for example regressions. IMO that's not in conflict with > >your > >changes. > > I'm agreeing with Simon
Thanks for agreeing, but the point of the beta is to test the implementation, especially of new classes. I find it really weird if we told people *not* to test the current implementation because it's already obsolete by the time the beta is released. Usually, if we found in the beta feedback that a major new feature requires a large refactoring, we'd either pull the feature back or we'd release a new beta so it could be tested. Relatively speaking, this is a major refactor of QVersionNumber. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
