> On 22 Oct 2014, at 15:13, Oswald Buddenhagen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >>> It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution >>> (macdeployqt does not deploy the file). >> >> I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if >> copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file. >> > well, morten's point was that you wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) do > that anyway (you should remove Headers). > >> Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl >> files one level up? >> >> There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even >> more consistent. >> > well, i can buy that argument. "the filesystem layout is not very > mac-like anyway". > > patches welcome. note that prls still need to be found at the old place.
Okay, if we think this can work then I can take a look. Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
