> 
> > Anyways, you missed the chance to convince people from the
> awesomeness
> > of your script before pissing everybody off with your megalomania.
> >
> i don't need to convince anyone of its awesomeness - the script will do that
> itself. otoh, your obstinate refusal to even try it doesn't speak for *your*
> character. in fact, it reminds me of a querulous, defiant child below ten.

Can we please put this discussion back on some sensible ground?

Oswald, your proposal touches every developers' daily workflow. Hence you 
should have been aware that concerns are raised by many people. So far your 
arguments were given by throwing loose bullet points to the list, which 
requires each reader to interpret the scenarios, but also the solution involved 
by using git-gpush. Could you please provide some more details on what is 
ongoing there? Maybe just point to previous mails on the list when you 
introduced it initially, if that is sufficient.

Furthermore one of the concerns is to change the workflow with git compared to 
other projects beside Qt. After all, it is different commands to be used when 
pushing to Qt gerrit if your proposal is accepted. So the benefits clearly have 
to outweigh those process changes.

IIRC Thiago has been one of persons using it in the past, has it been seen 
beneficial or causing problems? What is the impression by others who have 
actually tested it so far?

My personal concern was that I am forced to use the msysgit shell on Windows, 
which so far I managed to stay away from. But private discussion between the 
two of us revealed that this should not be required.

Maurice

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to