On Thursday 13 November 2014 07:56:31 Knoll Lars wrote: > On 13/11/14 08:40, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >On Thursday 13 November 2014 07:21:38 Knoll Lars wrote: > > > >> Yes, this could also simply be our qtmultimedia unit tests. Run the > >> > >>tests > >> > >> on your target platforms and if they pass it should be reasonably safe > >> > >>to > >> > >> assume that things are working. Of course we’re not there currently, our > >> coverage for QtMM is not good enough afaict. > > > > > >QtMultimedia's own unit tests use QtMultimedia, so it doesn't isolate the > >problem. We need tests that use *only* the lower-level multimedia API, > >like > >GStreamer. > > > Usually, I’d say that should be gstreamer’s job. They should provide unit > tests that allow testing a gstreamer implementation on a linux > system/board.
Agreed, and you'd expect that a decent Linux distribution runs them to be sure that they've installed everything correctly. But we're discussing a non-decent state already. If we could provide a handful of manual test scripts that let people check their conditions, we can isolate the problem and convince them it's not our fault. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
