On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote: > 2) User applications have plugins of their own
I don't think this would impact an end user app with its own plugins that also uses Qt5 plugins. The application would have been compiled with the paths for dlopen to search for its own plugins. And the Qt5 libraries will be compiled with their own paths for dlopen to search in. Nothing has linked to the Qt plugins, so there's no issue when the Qt plugin file names change (as opposed to changing the install_name and filename for a dylib, which would be a problem) between Qt releases if this bug is fixed. Hanspeter -- _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
