On Monday 17 November 2014 17:55:38 Gianluca wrote: > That is where maybe Qt communication fails. > Because I don’t have Git checkout of Qt source code, I was always tend to > avoid this mailing-list and to write only on the community forum. But maybe > you should take a look on the forum, because I seen a lot of time people > answering that the only way to get an answer is to ask on the development > mailing-list because only developer knows everything. But sometimes it’s > wrong.
I have no clue about the forums. I will not post there or monitor there because I dislike the medium. However, I can tell you that the [email protected] mailing list is monitored by a lot of developers. You can have discussions about the use of Qt there. It's not required to have a Git checkout. On this mailing list (development@), since we're talking about developing Qt, if you're here you're mostly expected to be contributing to Qt or to be willing to, which in turn translates to having a checkout. > In fact, I continue to think that it’s wrong to write on development > mailing-list to know if a certain module is under development or not, and > what features and improvements are planned for the next release. I agree. The interest@ mailing list would have been enough. My point is that if you posted here, you're assumed to be a developer or willing to become one. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
