On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:59:55 N. N. wrote: > > On Wednesday, 26 November 2014, 14:15, Hausmann Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > You are right, we need to add a few more features to QJSEngine. > > > > I'm not so much in favor of the default prototype for meta type api > > anymore, as it promotes the creation of slow conversion code I think. If > > you peek at my gerrit dashboard then you can see that I'm about 80% done > > with a series for gadget support that will allow you to expose your own > > value types without a conversion needed. > > I am wondering if just going directly to V8 instead of using Qt as the > middle man would be the best course of action, that way you get all the > speed benefits that V8 offers, and no need to mess with any conversion > code, with the only disadvantage, that I can think of, is adding another > dependency. Or, will this introduce linker errors with Qt's version of V8, > if all we need is QtCore.lib & QtGui.lib?
Since Qt doesn't use V8 anymore, there should not be any clashes at all. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
