On Friday 09 January 2015 22:15:25 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 20:19, André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote: > > C++ 'nullptr' only gives a benefit over '0' in the rare cases where it > > helps for disambiguation. I would not really like a policy encouraging > > 'nullptr' when '0' is just fine, but at least that would be tolerable. > > Not only that, compilers are starting to complain about 0 used in > place of NULL / nullptr, for instance GCC under > -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant.
We may have to add that to headersclean, since conceivably our users may want to use it. But we don't have to turn it on for our sources. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
