As a developer, I would rarely use the only Qt version provided by the distro. In fact, I currently have 8 different Qt-5 builds (partially because of some projects are sticking to some particular Qt-5 version/configuration/etc.) Having just a "qmake-qt5" solution doesn't fit my purposes; adding some freaky suffixes is not an option either.
As for Qt-4 and the qmake name clash, I *never* had a problem with building against a wrong Qt version, simply because I have a separate configuration for my Qt-4 builds. Regards, Konstantin 2015-01-18 4:15 GMT+04:00 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>: > Oh and… > > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Which implies that the Qt 5 development files install a "5.conf" global > > configuration file. That's all. > > … since this was never communicated that to us (at least not in any place > that we have read), the current Fedora packaging of qtchooser actually uses > qt5.conf instead. (That's something we can fix though. We do not officially > support qtchooser anyway, so we don't care all that much about broken > backwards-compatibility there. We are now changing the naming.) > > Kevin Kofler > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
