On Wednesday 11 February 2015 10:56:29 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 10:49:31 Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 07:54:52 Hausmann Simon wrote: > > > I suppose that it is absolutely unlikely that we are going to find a > > > consensus on what is purely an aesthetic issue. > > > > > > I for one am entirely with André and I do not like UPPERCASE macros in > > > my face unless I can avoid them. It's aesthetics and I suppose there > > > is little that will change that. > > > > > > As approver I will approve code that uses Q_NULLPTR but I expect others > > > reviewing my code to respect my preference to use 0 until we can use > > > nullptr. > > > > Apart from the claim that there is nothing technical in this discussion, > > I agree with the above. Respect the preference of the guy who codes. I > > like simple rules. This is one. > > I prefer using curly braces for if even if there is only one line. > This is what the KDE coding style mandate, it makes diff smaller when you > add or remove lines, and it helps preventing mistakes likes the "goto > fail; goto fail;" one. > Am i going to be allowed to use curly braces?
I, for one, won't stop you. -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
