On Saturday 21 February 2015 09:11:57 Sean Harmer wrote: > The best approach is likely to be for us to work with QNX to point out > where their dinkumware libcpp has problems with specific examples, as we > are doing regarding the recent constexpr support issue. I'm sure QNX will > be happy to get pointers as to where they can make improvements to be more > standard compliant.
Stop shipping Dinkumware and go for either libstdc++ (GPLv3+exception) or for libc++ (MIT). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
